Saturday, February 3, 2024

 

Patrick and Annette Patterson

In Defense of Patrick Patterson of Roanoke Catholic Schools

It has been a bit more than a week since Roanoke Catholic Schools announced the dismissal of its Head of School Patrick Patterson and Associate Head of School Nicole Lieber, and to this point, there has been little defense of Patterson and Lieber. WDBJ has done the only report of the dismissals that I’m aware of (other than Facebook posts), and its coverage has weighed heavily on the side of the Catholic Diocese of Richmond’s decision that the school “has determined that Roanoke Catholic Schools … would benefit from a new leadership approach.”

There was no further word from the diocese for the reasons behind the firings, but WDBJ quotes several parents (anonymously). In cases like this, non-disclosure agreements are common, giving dismissed employees monetary benefits for their silence. Patrick declined to talk to me about the reasons for his dismissal. Others, however, were eager to defend a man they consider to have been a strong and creative leader, a man of solid ethical base, and a role model.

I have known the Patterson family for years and it would never have occurred to me that Patrick was anything less than a visionary, a strong leader, a kind and forceful personality, a man whose primary professional attention was to the students. His wife, Annette, is one of the most influential and creative business leaders in the region and his kids are a delight, young women who are making their mark on the Valley.

I reached out to a number of people with close association to Roanoke Catholic over the years, including one who was part of the committee that hired Patrick some years ago, and without exception, they were shocked at the dismissal and supportive of Patrick. Not all were willing to go on the record, but they gave positive assessments of Patrick.

There is quite a bit of rumor filtering through the RCS community. I have found that Patterson shared information with the diocese about a smear campaign being pursued against him by a parent. Apparently, internal documents about students with identified disabilities were leaked outside of the school community and Patterson and his close associates told the diocese about them. This is the kind of information that circulates—whether or not true—in a dysfunctional system.

WDBJ reported that some “teachers say they felt a lack of support from administration, which led to some staff leaving. Some parents say they’ve considered removing their children from Roanoke Catholic as well.” The TV report featured only octogenarian Jerry Ewbank, who never worked with Patterson. He retired from RCS in 2001 and Patterson didn’t go to work there until 2010.

From what I’ve learned, the initial news source for WDBJ’s story works at the station.

When Patterson took over RCS in 2010, it was near death. There were fewer than 200 students registered to return and the budget that year was for 400 students. The school had 90 days to turn it around or the Bishop was reportedly ready to close the school in June 2011. Patterson saved RCS with some creative and thoughtful administration.

During his years, he was promoted to Regional Associate Superintendent, a first for the 200-year-old diocese. He served in a leadership role to administrators and faculty from Charlottesville to Bristol. He was on the Diocesan School Board and the diocesan accreditation review committee. He was selected to serve on the superintendent interview teams for the two most recent superintendents selected by the bishops of Richmond.

Paul Yengst, in a letter to Patterson, wrote that he was “disappointed to hear of your dismissal from Roanoke Catholic School. As the chairman of the committee that recruited you for the position, I have kept an eye on happenings on the hill. You told me once that ‘if you’re not green and growing, you’re brown and dying.’  I have certainly seen the green and growing at RCS.

“From the graduation rate, college scholarship awards, initiating of a building trades program and an aviation program, to the gym refurbishment, grounds improvements, energy innovations—and I could go on—Roanoke Catholic is a better school because of you. … From my perspective you have far surpassed what the committee expected in 2010. I think the School will be diminished by your absence.”

Frank Toney and his wife, Angela, are past school parents and current board members. Says Frank, “I have found [Patterson] to be nothing but man of integrity, He is a good communicator, a great leader. He saved the school, and he is a great business leader.

“I have seen him navigate quite a bit. He’s a compassionate man. He is more concerned with the less fortunate and he has a heart for those who are less than [others] … He is definitely concerned about the minority [and that is] not always the case dealing with Roanoke Catholic. … He made [the school] more a family than it was a school. It will be their loss that he’s no longer there. The school won’t be as strong as it was.”

Peter Radjou, Roanoke Catholic Schools’ chef and owner of Food Fanatics Kitchen, says Patrick is “a great administrator. I have great respect for him. I was surprised [at his dismissal] and I, pray for him. [The dismissal] does not change opinion. Definitely not.”

The silver lining in all this back-stabbing of a worthy man is that he is happy, relaxed and waking every morning eager to go to work at his Vinton gun shop, Pollard Street Pawn and Gun. He is working full-time there now.

All the while, a lot of those of us who have held RCS in high regard for a number of years, no longer do so. And that’s a damn shame. This is an ugly story, one where a good man suffered for doing a good job. The Pattersons have my support and my prayers going forward. They will be fine because they are good people.


56 comments:


  1. I have had kids at RCS for over 10 years and disagree with how your post characterizes the state of the school. It was struggling. However, Mr. Patterson is not the point anymore, the point is how best to help Roanoke Catholic move forward. - Matt O’Herron

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Roanoke Catholic was 30 days from closing when Pat took the position 15 years ago.

      Delete
    2. This is not true and has been disproven throughout the years. The school may have had a large debt but was no where near 30 days from closing. It is likely Pat even started this rumor to portray himself as a savior he wanted to be seen as.

      Delete
    3. As an alumni, we did not feel safe there. We as a class were constantly berated and treated like criminals in our own school. Patterson and Leiber are the reason for this treatment. The only positive role model at that school was Mr. Michael. Without him I would have graduated from another school. Patterson is an evil man whose morals do not align with roanoke catholics values. His “Pawn Shop” should be looked into, the tuition raises that the diocese was unaware of is just the tip of the iceberg. My junior and senior year was filled with hate and mistreatment because of Patterson and Leiber. I watched as 22 teachers left the year of my graduation. The academic rigor is gone as well as the discipline. It’s a shame and was for sure a waste of my money. I hope for growth and better leadership at this school. The past administration was toxic and cruel.

      Delete
  2. I support Patrick and haven't heard anything bad about him - Shane Barnett

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. then you didn’t really know him did you.

      Delete
    2. As someone who spent time at the Patterson’s and with his girls. He was an unethical money and power hungry dictator. I heard and saw things no child should see from their principal. So much so that my mother denied me from continuing to hang out with his family. His wife is a lovely lady but married to a fraud who takes pride in treating his faculty and students with disrespect and hate. I hope for better representation in the future. As for Nicky Leiber, she’s a witch. She over sexualized swimmers i’m swim suits, probably because she herself could never get in one. She was rude to students and unsupportive of our college aspirations. She was also unkind to staff, and many teachers and coached vocalized this. There is a special place in hell for that woman.

      Delete
  3. As a spouse to an RCS teacher and a parent of children that attend I have argument with a few things:

    1 - Patrick’s wife has nothing to do with this. Why even bring her in to this. It doesn’t add credibility to your argument.

    2 - While Patrick may have been a reasonable appointment for the school when he was first hired (and I cannot argue otherwise as I wasn’t in Roanoke at the time), he clearly wasn’t the right leader for today, nor for the future. Hence the decision to remove him and his Dean of Students partner.

    3 - I know that the number of people interviewed during the investigation was so overwhelming that they couldn’t accept more volunteers to provide their feedback. Which indicates that your opinions, viewpoint, supporting evidence is not the general consensus.

    4 - Teacher attrition is at record levels… 16 teachers left last school year. 16! “Some staff leaving”… 16 leaving in a single school year! That ain’t “some”… it’s 16 across just 13 grades (K-12). This does not support your argument of a “role model” leader nor “good man” nor “good job”. If those two were doing a good job, they wouldn’t have the attrition of staff they experienced.

    5 - Students are bleeding out to the public schools. RCS parents are moving their children to the public schools because they question the ability for RCS to provide excellence in education given the teacher attrition and pattern of other families removing their children (myself included)

    In my opinion, the diocese did the right thing. RCS needs new leadership and I hope they can turn this around. I want to believe that they can.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This all sounds political let's get down to what is really going on

    ReplyDelete
  5. As someone who worked at RCS before and after Patterson, I can without a doubt refute the "family" atmosphere after he arrived. He was not kind to his faculty and staff. I know this from first hand experience! Trying to spin this to make him look like a saint will not work for those of us who lived the experience, we know better!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sad seeing grown adults still gossiping about this. It’s over, move on. Taking sides doesn’t accomplish much of anything at this point. We wish the school luck in their future! I can’t be the only one who wants to move on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're commenting on a blog post and putting yourself right in the middle of the drama. You ARE a grown adult gossiping so sad for you

      Delete
  7. I appreciate the opportunity to reply to this blog anonymously, as I am not comfortable at all divulging my identity (not only out of concern for myself, but more so out of concern for my children). However, I feel very strongly called to rebut and share my and other RCS employees’ experiences. I hope that you won’t delete this reply as it will run counter to the overall message of your blog.

    As a former teacher for Pat Patterson (I also taught there before he arrived so I can testify to the change in atmosphere at the school after he arrived) and a former parent of RCS students, I can honestly say that the Diocese did EXACTLY what they should have done. My only regret is that they should have done it when parents first brought their concerns and anonymous statements from faculty/staff members who were being mistreated (and feared for their jobs, hence the anonymity) to the previous bishop back in (I think) 2011-12. It was not just a case of a “lack of support from administration”. I can PERSONALLY testify to the cruelty with which he treated faculty/staff, especially women. He didn’t like anyone who showed any kind gumption or who stood up to any of his tyrannical behaviors. Employees were interrogated, yelled at, and had their jobs threatened on a regular basis. He also threatened expulsion of employees’ children if they (the employees, not the children) displeased him. This was also his tactic with office staff members who he felt weren’t towing his “company line”. Anyone who thinks he was “a man of solid ethical base, and a role model” or a compassionate and caring administrator obviously did not work for him. If he was such a wonderful leader and a man of integrity, then why have so many teachers/staff members left over the years, sometimes in the middle of the school year? When we came to RCS, there was MINIMAL faculty/staff turnover~ it just didn’t happen.

    The reason that enrollment was down when he took over was because the former head of school (who WAS a kind and compassionate leader) was not a good money manager and had accrued a large debt, which was concerning for parents as increases in tuition were definitely on the horizon and salaries were also affected. Pat started his tenure as head of school by telling us at the first faculty meeting that HE was in charge and whoever didn’t like it was welcome to leave, that he had a stack of resumes on his desk and we would be replaced by the end of the day. THAT is the tone with which he began his “leadership” at a school whose motto is “Blending learning with faith and faith with daily life”.

    Just because a person can raise money to fund improvements or start new programs at a school, doesn’t mean that they are a good person or treat their employees or students with respect and benevolence. Knowing him in the business community where he is invested in projecting a certain image or personally as a friend is VERY DIFFERENT from working for him or having him as your head of school.

    I haven’t even begun to address the enrollment. His inability to be a good school leader is also a contributing factor as to why parents were pulling students from the school. The enrollment is down and that is directly related to the administration and lack of support for students and parents when there is a problem. We pulled our children out after YEARS of bullying. We followed the chain of command in an effort to get help so our children could continue to get a Catholic education, but to no avail. If you could donate money or your child was a good athlete, their behavior was tolerated.

    The fact that someone on the hiring committee is defending him is not a surprise. No one wants to admit that they made a mistake or were duped by someone who wanted a particular job. However, the fact still remains that they did make a mistake and Pat may have had the business acumen to “save” the school financially but he did not have the humanity to guide and lead a school and all the people who make up that community. The diocese was 100% correct in their actions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for sharing this. It’s really sad that after all of this, there is still no accountability on their part. They know what they did to the countless families, but somehow they are still victim.

      Delete
  8. I can’t help but think the only person who could ever write such a “an opinion “ as this , is someone who did not know Patrick at all . As a parent who feels such guilt in having sent her children to a place for a more “ Christian atmosphere “ , and finding out that the place you chose could not have been further from that, I am here to tell you that you are so wrong!!!! Patrick’s lack of integrity, character, and moral compass was bases on which the school was run from the moment he step foot into RCS. I saw many teachers , students, including my own bullied and yet no help was ever offered. Public schools have checks and balances , RCS did not ! I pray that the Diocese continues to investigate . Do not sit here and tell me what you think when you have no idea what those of us have lived

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yep, Dan, this isn’t the objective journalistic standard to which you may have once ascribed. Perhaps next you can offer your marketing services for Patrick’s pawn and gun shop?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly! I suspect Dan is either a close friend to Patterson, or being manipulated by Patterson. Hopefully, neither assumption is correct and Dan will dig a little further into the story…. Or, perhaps Patterson has something on him.

      Delete
  10. He punished students who didn’t deserve to be punished. Kids will make mistakes but not all mistakes need punishment. If it nothing to do with drugs, alcohol or violence, and if the student is an Honor Student and has caused zero trouble in the past, then those situations should be handled differently. As administration of the school, the goal should be to teach the students how to deal with situations and not just hand out punishments.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Every word of this blog is appalling. The physical and emotional damage that this man has imposed on hundreds of children, parents, families, teachers, and staff is immeasurable.
    I have to ask why a reputable journalist didn’t do his homework before he blogged this? When so many volunteers wanted to share their horrors with the Diocese, why didn’t you try to talk to them? Opinion blog or no, you’ve done us all a disservice. Why didn’t you ask yourself for a split second what all the hubbub was about? Just because you were never been shown the other side of this tarnished, counterfeit coin does not mean that he was perp-walked off the campus of his fiefdom for no reason. I’ve seen folks who have fallen into the same trap you did, though, on this very blog. You and those people need some perspective. If you had donatable money or bought into his façade, you would never be allowed to see the dark side of his character. Unfortunately, though, it was still an integral part of him and how he ruled the school. If you didn’t say or act exactly as he wanted, you may as well have stripped naked and painted a target on your chest. He physically harassed parents, teachers, staff, and even children. He would seat them in his office so he could tower over them and spit-scream into their faces about how worthless they were. He promised teachers they would never work in education again unless they did what they were told and toed his current party line (which was constantly in flux). He told one school organization one thing but said the opposite to the Advisory Board, accusing one side of lying to the other, and treating those who were actually in the two different meetings and who dared to question him on his assertions the exact same way. He menaced people’s children, family, careers, and faith on a daily basis.
    He would send crying children back to class and joke about it later. He would make families and faculty feel so miserable that they would leave the school, and he would cover his behavior with false platitudes, explaining that there were “cultural differences” or that they were “just not nice people.” In all cases, though, he then bad-mouthed them after they left. Nothing nice was ever said by this man after he drove out families, faculty or staff. Any crime that he committed was pinned on someone he chased out – which introduces the next question:
    “Is anyone going to ‘follow the money’?”
    If the Diocese of Richmond didn’t want to just put a lid on this, they would do so. Community members have documented for over a decade the misappropriation and total disappearance of funds donated or claimed through grants, and they have reported it to the Diocese. Unless they produced a copy of the check of a designated gift, you could expect it to disappear, and the copies of these checks were the only way to recover or properly allocate the funds. Money designated for one program was attributed to another, but the fault always lay with the bookkeeper – never with the person who actually had the power to reallocate the donations. If the Diocese really cared, they would keep their investigators digging into what has actually been happening since Patrick Patterson maneuvered his way into this “leadership” position.
    I do want to thank you for one thing, though – you have finally given a space for the truth to come out. You have given those of us who have been silenced a chance to share our horrors with the world. I am so sorry that you allowed yourself to be snowed and compromised in order for this to happen, but I hope that you will continue to give us space and voice to share the truth that he has managed to hide for so very long.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To the previous commenter: THANK YOU. Your comment made me realize that I WAS NOT THE ONLY ONE. I wish I had known at the time that others were being treated the same way. When you said "He would seat them in his office so he could tower over them and spit-scream into their faces about how worthless they were. He promised teachers they would never work in education again unless they did what they were told and toed his current party line (which was constantly in flux)", made me burst into tears. It was truly scarring to be treated that way, by ANYONE, much less my administrator. In all my years of teaching, in both Catholic and public schools, here in Virginia and other states, I have never been abused by an administrator like that. Again, THANK YOU. We need a "Survivors of Pat Patterson Club".

      Delete
    2. Spit & scream into their faces? I have a feeling you may need to go to confession. If that happened, who did you report it too? I’m sure it’s documented somewhere if that was the case. Maybe the diocese could investigate that as well. And money? Do you actually think the head of a school deals with checks or cash coming into the office? The only thing they see are monthly financial reports. More gossip…. Y’all probably believe everything Trump says too.

      Delete
    3. Why would I need to go to confession for something awful that happened to me and many of my fellow coworkers? You need to take a serious look at yourself if that's your first response to us voicing our abuse. We did report it... to the diocese... who ignored it for a decade until obviously it became too much to ignore or Patterson did something much worse.

      Delete
  12. As a previous student and staff member this has been a long time coming. Everything that has been pointed out about Patterson is accurate. Leiber was his lackey and did his bidding so she’s culpable too. You were either on his good list- or he made your life a living hell. One year over 20 staff and faculty left by the end of the year….. The way he treated people was gross and he definitely does not live the Christian example he pretends to project

    ReplyDelete
  13. This blogger is obviously biased 🙄

    ReplyDelete
  14. As a student who experienced RCS both before and after Patterson, I have to disagree with basically everything you have stated above. Patterson is an abusive narcissist. Simple as that, there is no beating around the bush. From the way he speaks to teachers, students, and parents, even just in passing, to the way his DAUGHTERS threaten expulsion and punishment to fellow students because "their daddy was the principal". Patterson built and encouraged a culture of fear and obedience, a school-wide clique that poisoned the entire Catholic community in the valley for years. If students weren't in the "it" group, many were bullied relentlessly and Patterson's response to this problem was "oh well". Many children left RCS and from my personal knowledge, many who left even walked away from the church. All due to Patterson's faults and immoral leadership. That doesn't sound like someone you want leading the premiere Catholic school in the valley to me.

    Additionally, I am also a child of a teacher at RCS, which may make you want to sit back and say I am simply defending my parent, but oh no. Seeing my parent come home in tears and experience severe anxiety over what was happening at work, and attempt to hide it from me, was heartbreaking. No person who has power should treat others that way. Patterson may have taught me that, but he's a sad, small man for having me need to learn that lesson anyway. But the thing is Patterson liked that he had that power over people, disrupting their lives outside of school. I can tell you right now he is enjoying just reading that he did.

    Patterson's wife, Annette, is not free from any guilt either. Heavily involving herself in extracurriculars and sport teams, Annette would play what only can be described as a game of thrones amongst students. Pitting students against each other, involving herself in the drama, telling students to do one thing to their face and recommending their expulsion from teams and the school behind it.

    The Patterson's inability to accept their consequences and move on with grace (though frankly, they probably have no idea how) will continue to poison this community for years to come.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I left the church also because of him

      Delete
    2. If you left the church because of him, you were going for the wrong reasons in the first place.

      Delete
    3. That's that great RCS education right there for you, I never said I left the church, but I know many people who did. I did, however, change my parishes because I did not want to see Patterson sitting in the front row of St. Andrews acting like he hadn't personally abused many people in the room. Additionally, even if I or any others did, it would not be for the wrong reasons. If the church is going to put a man like that in charge and ignore his transgressions, that is not a church I want to be a part of.

      Delete
    4. I’ve never been an RCS student, but the statement says “I left the church also because of him.” And who said “Patterson” (since you apparently are incapable of showing respect enough to use a formal title like Mr.) hasn’t accepted their consequences and moved on with grace? Is Mr. Patterson out there writing nasty things about you or blogging about how much he misses the criticism and constant questioning on a daily basis? If I were him, I would have stopped dealing with your type a long time ago.

      Delete
    5. Oh, you've never been an RCS student? How are you even connected to this? Your opinion held little weight before and now it holds next to none. You replied to my comment and did not make it clear you were replying to another reply. You were also quite rude so I felt the need to reply to that. That's what most of your comments have been, quite rude and un-Christ like, exact what you accuse our comments of being.

      I referred to Patterson as such because that in AP and CP styles (both of which I learned at my public school and top-public university I got into AFTER leaving RCS) that is how you refer to an individual. There is no need for titles such as Mr. or Mrs. But even if there was, Patterson does not deserve my respect and will never have it.

      It is evident you have no idea about this situation beyond this blog. Members of the Patterson family are spreading vile posts and lies across social media accusing anyone they can of being the problem except for them. That doesn't sound like moving on with grace, does it? He receives the criticism and constant questioning he deserves. Frankly, stepping into the position of power he held, he subjects himself to it even without the abusive actions he decided to take. That is the nature of power. So get off your knees, wipe off your nose, and stop harassing people who have already been hurt enough. I suggest you go to confession for this upcoming Lenten season and ask for forgiveness because clearly you need it.

      Delete
  15. Patterson’s dismissal was YEARS overdue. He was good for the bottom line, probably, which is why he lasted as long as he did. But he was a terrible administrator when it came to people. His behavior toward staff and teachers can only be described as abusive. Look at how many people have fled. Look at how many people have pulled their students. And now watch how many people will come back. Good riddance, PP.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I’m sure folks will be busting down the doors now that they see everyone talking so fondly of the school on the internet. This will be such a great marketing opportunity!

      Delete
  16. 👋🏼 👋🏼 🦵🏼 💩

    ReplyDelete
  17. My children still have nightmares from our time at Roanoke Catholic

    ReplyDelete
  18. I am a parent of 3 graduated sons of RCS. All 3 thrived at RCS throughout lower enrollment numbers times, worse debt to positive cash flow ratio and lack of local Parish and Diocesan $upport the outgoing administration ever encountered. I served as School Board Chair and Head of the Home School Assoc. It is tragic that wherever the basis of dismissal was grounded; It should have not been allowed to foment to this point. As there most likely is ample blame to go around I pray and plead with outgoing parents, “Please do not succumb to the temptation that your desire for a top tier educational environment, for your children, will be found in the Public School system”. The Holy Spirit has Not forsook RCS. Pray 🙏. Examine what HE has in store going forward. PCB3

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Only someone who ignored the problem would believe there is ample blame to go around

      Delete
    2. This is the kind of ridiculous statement that kept us at RCS much longer than we should have stayed. First of all, this blog is about Pat Patterson's shortcomings, not the school's. Your sons got a good education DESPITE his flawed leadership, not BECAUSE of it, due the hard work of those teachers who had to endure Pat and Nikki and their dictatorial style. OF COURSE the Holy Spirit will not forsake RCS but thank GOD the Diocese didn't, either! They stepped in to ensure that it will recover from this blight and be a stronger educational environment in the long run. Praise God that they finally saw the need to remove the administrators and are looking for new ones so RCS can be great again (and it will be!). The statement that there is "ample blame to go around" is confusing. Who else might be to blame but the people in charge? Surely not their employees whom I observed to be just trying to do their jobs which are hard enough without being in a hostile work environment. However, in conclusion, please do not succumb to the temptation that RCS is the only place in the Valley to receive a top tier education. Our children left and went to public school and both got into top tier colleges based on the education they received AFTER leaving RCS. True, they got a good grammar school foundation, but it was the knowledge they accrued in middle/high school that helped them score highly on the SATs and ACTs, write excellent college essays and get great scholarships. Our children had opportunities and AP classes in public school that could never be offered in such a small school environment and we hope that is the first thing addressed by the new administration. Whoever they are, our prayers go with them.

      Delete
  19. You people, some who even call yourselves Christians, have to be the most miserable, evil, and farthest thing from Christ-like humans on this earth. The fact that you spawn this stupid gossip into Gospel truth and have about 1/4 of the accurate information is beyond telling for the kind of people that have a connection to Roanoke Catholic. Everyone on here obviously knows how to run a school. You are all fine examples of what’s wrong with education today…especially private education. Why would teachers or even administrators want to work in this environment when they have such seething hatred waiting around every corner? Take a good look in the mirror and ask yourself how you’ve been Jesus to someone today. There are better ways you can impact this world than sitting behind your keyboard being ugly. May God Bless all that have been touched by these changes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, we are the problem for commiserating over our shared experiences over the last few years. Maybe some of the details are not 100% accurate, but the the sentiments all overlap.

      -an RCS alum that watched all the classmates they grew up with either get kicked out of or leave the school

      Delete
    2. “most miserable, evil, and farthest thing from Christ-like humans on this earth”. ——all 100-120 of us who gave interviews to the diocese?

      Delete
    3. And did you look in the mirror before you posted this and ask if this was what Jesus would do? Instead of doing exactly what you are accusing all of us to be doing, sit with yourself and ask why you believe one thing when dozens to HUNDREDS of people are saying the exact opposite, Libby

      Delete
    4. My name is not Libby, sweetie. There you go jumping to conclusions without accurate information and your information (based on your warped sense of reality) is WRONG!

      Delete

    5. Tell me you are a Patterson without telling me you are a Patterson. "You people, some who even call yourselves Christians, have to be the most miserable, evil, and farthest thing from Christ-like humans on this earth", and "Take a good look in the mirror and ask yourself how you’ve been Jesus to someone today" sound EXACTLY like the posts I have seen on a certain person's Facebook page and in comments on other's FB posts about the situation. It must be hard reading about what I am pretty sure is your loved one and what he did to so many faculty, staff and families at RCS for almost 15 years, but lashing out at the real victims isn't going to change what happened. And who are you to dismiss someone's sharing of a horrible experience as not "accurate information"? We are finally able to tell our stories, thanks to this blog, without fear of repercussions. You were not present to witness the interactions so you are the one without the accurate information. I'm sure your loved one didn't come home and say, "I yelled at and threatened a teacher/student/parent today and reduced them to tears. It was a good day!" And if you will read carefully, you will see that it has been stated multiple times that people have been reaching out to the diocese for years. Not sure what finally got them to listen but I am so thankful that they did. Over 100 people came forward to speak to the diocese, who must have found them credible or Patterson would still be in charge. If his behavior were more "Christ-like", he wouldn't be in this mess. Put THAT in your hemp pipe and smoke it.

      Delete
    6. Sounds like something a Libby would say when they're caught

      Delete
    7. How did you just read through all of these testaments and call the VICTIMS evil? We’re not talking about running a school, we’re talking about decency. The teachers didn’t want to work there- many were leaving. Hence the issue being brought to the diocese. Can you please let the people who have been silenced for YEARS have a minute? It’s long overdue.

      Delete
    8. I am very much a Christian and can promise my words are not gossip, neither are the other true stories on this blog. The people who lived through this abuse have every right to share their stories, and there ARE hundreds of us! I could understand if this was one or two isolated stories, but there are hundreds of people who came forth to the Diocese with very similar stories. Since leaving RCS, I have been in public and private educational systems, and have not once encountered the abuse I received at RCS through Patterson. Someone sharing a story they lived does not mean that they are unchristian like or evil.

      Delete
  20. In the words of Jason Isbel, …. “Hope the high road leads you home again.” I feel this is in danger of becoming too mean-spirited. For those of us who knew, the original post was impossible to swallow. It needed to be exposed to light of the truth. Thankfully the blog allowed us a space to air the truth and, in a way to move forward. Let’s keep that up but not hurt ourselves and others by (again Jason Isbel) “fighting down in the ditch.” The truth hurts enough.
    Matt O’Herron

    ReplyDelete
  21. I agree, Matt. When it was just people sharing their stories of their negative interactions with Pat Patterson, it was fine. It’s important for healing to be able to get that out. When the Pat Patterson defenders got on here, they brought the ugly. Those poor people who have been hurt by Pat have suffered enough and questioning their experience is blaming the victim.

    ReplyDelete
  22. It was about time he was removed. I allowed my child at his home once and never again after what my child shared with me. I pulled my child from RCS in 2017 and the only regret I had was that I ever sent them to RCS in the first place. I could talk for hours about our experiences there and have posted some of them publicly. The therapy was more expensive than the tuition.

    ReplyDelete

You are invited to comment, but please be civilized and kind.

Previously

  Mom arriving at Woodrum Field on her first airplane flight in the early 1970s. (The following is from my memoir,  "Burning the Furnit...

Welcome to editrdan